Archive for June, 2009
Does Jimmy Dimora Deserve His Rights?
Posted by Roldo Bartimole in Media, People, Politicians on June 30, 2009
June 30, 2009… Does Jimmy Dimora deserve the privilege of being considered innocent until proven guilty? I don’t think The Plain Dealer believes so.
I can’t argue with there being news coverage of the county corruption issues. However, I think the Plain Dealer has been using the mess for a circulation boost.
Big black headlines almost daily. Lots of space that give the impression of a crusade. Large photographs of public officials.
It all has the quality of a campaign. However, editors don’t run for office.
They are running these days, however, for their lives. The temptation to play a juicy story big to attract and keep readers and subscribers has to be enticing.
Newspapers are troubled by declining interest and declining revenues. Anything that can change that formula presents opportunities.
Fat Jimmy Dimora makes quite a target. And the PD has been using him as a piñata on the front page almost daily.
Yesterday Dimora struck back. What he had to say doesn’t absolve him of anything yet. However, it did strike a feeling in me of, hey, maybe this guy isn’t as guilty as he’s been painted.
As he said himself, “I’m not an angel, but I’m not a crook.”
Well, it may take a court to prove the latter.
Until that time, the guy is innocent under our laws.
Someone said that Dimora was being Sam “Shepparded” by the PD. That refers to the way Sam Sheppard’s guilt in the murder of his wife was railroaded by the Cleveland news media, especially the defunct Cleveland Press. The truth in the Sheppard case, whatever it was, got mangled.
I don’t think what the PD has done is the same. However, the headlines have the same smell.
It’s not a good direction for a newspaper. It’s not good for a newspaper in the long run. It can damage credibility.
I watched the video the PD put on its site of the press conference. It ran 2:59 minutes. The press conference, according to someone who timed it, ran about 33 minutes. I went to Channel 8, WJW, to view its video. It was 12:11 seconds. It gave a better feel for what Dimora had to say.
I got a more comprehensive view of Dimora’s press conference from the television station than I did from the newspaper.
I asked the PD about its abbreviated video.
Managing editor Debra Simmons responded to the email I sent Editor Susan Goldberg, who is out of town, saying “We quickly posted a short excerpt of the press conference last night. There’s more to come. We will put the full press conference on line this afternoon.”
As of 1:25, Tuesday, as this is being written, the 2:59 minute version is still up. There are more than 100 responses, most seem clearly against Dimora and with the typical mocking tone: “Boss Feed,” “Needs a psychiatrist,” “It’s a blimp.”
(In checking back at 1:45 the original video was gone and there was no replacement in its place of a longer version at that time.)
(Checking in the evening, Cleveland.com has what I believe is the entire Dimora press conference in two segements.)
Since Dimora has been dominating the front page of the PD with stories pointing to his dishonesty, I thought it would have been fair for the PD to give him his full shot. The paper did play the press conference on the front page. And it did have – likely for the first time – a respectful photo of the man. It’s easy to ridicule with huge photos, especially of an admittedly overweight man.
You can convict people more easily on the front page than you can in a courtroom.
I did get a response from Goldberg on another question I asked. I asked her in an email about Dimora’s criticism of her and Brent Larkin’s lunch with Republican boss Bob Bennett and whether she had had similar sit-downs with Democratic leaders.
Here’s her response: “The criticism of me having lunch with a Republican official is beyond ridiculous. I have had lunches, breakfasts and coffees (and multiple foodless meetings) with dozens and dozens of people from across the political spectrum. I consider it part of my job. Without looking at my calendar or getting into specifics, I would guess I’ve had more meetings with Democrats than Republicans, if only because there are more elected Democratic officials than Republicans around here.”
Dimora wants us to believe that there was a conspiracy hatched out of the President George Bush administration via Karl Rove to get Democratic Party leaders before the 2008 election.
That’s something I don’t have too much trouble considering.
City of Cleveland Pays Way More Stadium Taxes Than Browns Pay in Rent
Posted by Roldo Bartimole in Economic Development, Politicians on June 28, 2009
June 28, 2009… The City of Cleveland annually now pays $202,700 more in property taxes on Browns Stadium than the Browns pay the city to rent the stadium all year.
Isn’t that some kind of generosity or maybe gross corruption?
Although Browns Stadium is owned by the City of Cleveland it must still pay property taxes because it is used for private business. The Browns are owned by the Lerner family.
The city pays a total of $452,724 in taxes on the Stadium land. The land is valued at $5,588,170 for tax purposes. The market value of the land alone is $15,966,200, according to the County Auditor’s Real Property Information.
And we keep giving away lakefront land for pennies.
The city pays the property tax only on the land, not the stadium built during the administration of Mayor Michael White. The stadium has – as Progressive Field and Quicken Arena have – been tax exempted by state law. The law was lobbied in Columbus primarily by White and County Commissioner Tim Hagan in the early 1990s.
The Lerner family paid nothing for the land and nothing for the stadium. Nice work if you can get it. And they could.
We can thank Mayor White for this gift-giving generosity.
The Cleveland Browns pay the city a measly $250,000 a year to rent the stadium. That rent remains the same for 30 years. Never to increase, as negotiated by the city’s lawyers.
In addition, the city pays the insurance on the stadium, another gift made by White to the Lerners, with the help, of course, of attorney Fred Nance, of Squire, Sanders & Dempsey. Nance negotiated the deal. Nance, not unexpectedly, is now the Browns’ attorney.
The big irony: The hated Art Modell paid more to the city to rent the old stadium than the Lerners pay for the new stadium at the same location.
These are the kind of deals that neither the FBI nor any other governmental body nor the Plain Dealer investigate or indict.
This is the honest corruption of our civic society. And so it does go.