Posts Tagged Cleveland Browns
Can You Spare a Dime for Randy Lerner?
Posted by Roldo Bartimole in Economic Development, Media on June 7, 2010
June 7, 2010… The City of Cleveland has refinanced Browns Stadium bonds to the tune of $183,856,270.35 in two refinancing deals.
Did Randy Lerner say thanks? I don’t think so.
And because I know no one will report this: The City of Cleveland from its deflated general fund also had to pay $850,000 into the Browns Stadium capital fund this year. And it has to do the same next year. And the next year. And the next year.
Not to bore you, the draining city will do the same until 2020.
You might think the city then is off the hook. No, no.
In 2021 the city’s contribution rises to $5.9 million; in 2022 it will be $6.3 million; in 2023 it will be $6.7 million; in 2024 it will be $7.1 million; in 2025 it will be $7.5 million.
In case you don’t have your calculator handy those general fund payments total up to $42.8 million rounded off. It actually was more because in earlier years the city had put away $710,909 in the capital repair fund.
Would you like a beer, Mr. Lerner?
But then from 2026 through 2028, the city pays zero. Isn’t that great.
It is unless you know how the game works. That’s when there will be a crisis. The stadium isn’t up to date. It looks so shabby. WE NEED A NEW STADIUM OR WE’LL LOSE THE BROWNS. Heavens, no!
If you look to a recent posting of mine you’ll find that the taxpayers of Cuyahoga County via the extended (an added 10-years after a voted 15 years) “sin” tax already paid $66.2 million since August 2005.
This amount helps pay for Browns Stadium bonds. The tax continues to go to pay for Lerner’s stadium until it reaches $116 million. Although $29 million of the $116 million could go to help the city’s need to pay off its capital fund. Anything above the $116 million is supposed to go to Cuyahoga County. We wait with abated breath.
Could you use a taco, Mr. Lerner? Maybe an extra cushion?
In addition, three other taxes passed by City Council help pay off the bonds: a 2 percent additional admission tax on events of sport, theater, concert and many other businesses; an 8 percent parking tax when you park in Cleveland; and a $2 fee for car rental. The taxes took effect in 1995-96. By 1998, taxpayers had contributed another $33 million via the three taxes. The stadium opened August 21 1999.
The taxes never stop. Tied up like a hog, as Fannie Lewis used to say.
I’ll repeat what I wrote in November 1998, when Fred Nance was at the Council table answering questions about these financial details. Nance, you might remember, also did the original negotiation on the Medical Mart deal. Oh, what ropes tie taxpayers on that one? Only Mr. Nance truly knows.
Nance said back in 1998, “This city as a whole – Council and administration – obligated ourselves (ha) to pay whatever it takes to finish this stadium…” I added in my newsletter Point of View: “He didn’t tell Council that he, as chief negotiator, was also the chief obligator.”
I wrote further: “Council also was reminded again and again by (Mayor Michael) White’s legal consultant Fred Nance of Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, that City Council had authorized the city, by its passage of the legislation authorizing the stadium, to make these additional arrangements. ‘You signed off through the legislation you approved in 1996. I could show you the specific provision if you would like…’ He continued, ‘The answer is (ordinance) 303-96, specifically Section 12 B….’ Clever Mr. Nance. Doesn’t he work for the Cleveland Browns now? Oh, yes. He’s chief counsel.
Yes, all tied up in a pretty bow. As I wrote then, Nance used his best “Gotcha” tones to a hog-tied Council.
I summed it up: “In other words, Mike White can do what the hell he wants and Fred Nance will tell you so any time you want to hear about it. With a smile. Or is it a smirk.”
Now you know which face, don’t you?
And the city tells me it has another small refunding piece of debt of $13.7 million in addition to the refinanced $183 million in debt.
Oh, did I say that there are no property taxes on the stadium. It’s exempted by state law. That diverts some $7 to $8 million a year from the revenue of the Cleveland schools, Cuyahoga County, Cleveland and the city libraries. There are property taxes on the city land upon which the stadium sits. But the City of Cleveland pays those taxes and they are far higher than the rent Lerner pays for the use of the lakefront stadium. The city also obligated itself to provide casualty insurance for the stadium.
Can we get you any mustard, Mr. Lerner?
I’m sure you are interested in what Randy Lerner – made wealthy by MNBA and credit cards, pays to use this very expensive stadium. He pays a measly $250,000 a year. Never an increase, according to the lease. Yes, never over the 30 year lease. He also, however, is responsible for ordinary upkeep of the stadium. The stadium seems to be used, at least in part, maybe a bit over a week each year. The stadium sits on city land. Expensive lakefront land.
Can we get you a hot dog, Mr. Lerner?
Billionaire Lerner enjoys all the revenue from the 72,000 seat stadium. Seating includes 145 suites and 8,500 club seats. Approximately 100,000 square feet of the facility is committed to restaurants, food concessions and retail facilities. All to the benefit of renter Lerner.
Can we get you a martini, Mr. Lerner?
By the way, the city doesn’t even enjoy full income tax revenue from the Browns players and executives’ salaries. The late Al Lerner, Randy’s dad, got suburban Berea to build him a practice facility for the team. The city income taxes are thus split between Cleveland and Berea.
What a deal Cleveland worked!
What a great use of public funds for our shrinking city of poverty.
The Plain Dealer and the rest of the media go a bit crazy about the criminal aspects of our rotten County government, now under FBI probes. Good that they do. Over and over again.
However, there’s no fuss at all about this legal corruption. It’s not on the radar for critical reporting or analysis. Indeed, just the opposite. Save LeBron. Forget the rest of the people.
And these “journalists” wonder why they are thought so little of by the general public. The real downfall of the so-called mainstream media took place long ago. People knew that they were not getting what they needed in a democracy dependent upon information. They knew that the corporate, civic, foundation, political string-pullers were stacking the deck against them. But what could they do? The news media’s foundation of credibility corroded long ago. I saw it as a young reporter. And got out.
I recently caught the end of the movie “Good Night and Good Luck” about Edward R. Morrow. It told about the death of just a half hour of real TV news. It enlightens very well of the corruption from within the news media.
So, Good Day and Good Luck. You aren’t getting anything even that from today’s corporate news providers.
Joseph Pulitzer once said, “A free press should…always oppose privileged classes and public plunderers, never lack sympathy with the poor, always remain devoted to the public welfare.” Ha.
It happens so infrequently that you might as well admit it just doesn’t happen.
What do we do about it? We aren’t going to do anything about it.
Do Taxpayers of Cleveland & Cuyahoga Have to Always Carry the Cost of Institutions that Serve a Much Wider Area of Northeast Ohio?
Posted by Roldo Bartimole in Economic Development, Politicians on May 6, 2010
May 6, 2010… I read in the New York Times Friday that plans are being formulated to redo Progressive Field. Who knew?
A Gateway official says, however, that there is no big redo coming. Further, at this point, both teams leasing sports facilities are responsible for capital improvements.
But don’t you know that it is coming: We need a new stadium! The Indians might leave town! What we’ve heard before we will hear again. It’s only a matter of time.
It does bring up the question of how Cleveland and Cuyahoga County can continue to afford to build and support major institutions that serve a larger geographic area. Not only sports but cultural.
It does seem past the time for thinking about how we preserve the many facilities, institutions and infrastructure assets of Cleveland. The city is rich in major sports and cultural institutions, relics of a wealthier era. How can they be preserved? Who will pay for them?
Most of the actual institutions servicing Northeastern Ohio residents physically are in Cleveland or Cuyahoga County. Does that mean only those residents enjoy those venues? Of course not.
Progressive Field, Quicken Arena, Browns Stadium, Playhouse Square’s stages (Allen, Ohio, State, Palace theaters), the Cleveland Art Museum, Severance Hall and the Cleveland Orchestra. Even the highly subsidized downtown assets of Cleveland. These are places that serve a wider area of northeast Ohio, not just Cleveland or Cuyahoga residents.
But the bill to pay for these important institutions seems to fall, at least the public portion, most heavily upon Cleveland and Cuyahoga taxpayers. Every day in almost every way. And, unfortunately, they are regressive sales taxes weighing heavily on lower and middle income people. None are progressive taxes. Thanks to people like Tim Hagan and Mike White, George Voinovich and George Forbes.
In the latest County Auditor reports we get an idea of the tax burden here:
- The Medical Mart/Convention Center – Cuyahoga taxpayers have contributed via the quarter percent sale tax hike – $94,379,438.38 since only January 2008. Cuyahoga residents will be paying this tax for 20 years.
- Browns Stadium – Cuyahoga taxpayers have contributed via various alcohol sales taxes – $64,609,806.86 since August 2005. The tax previously amounted to some $266 million to help pay for some of Gateway’s costs at the baseball and basketball facilities. The tax was levied for 15 years for Gateway and 10 more years for the football stadium, taking us to 2015. Hopefully, not to be renewed.
- The Arts & Culture tax – Cuyahoga taxpayers have been paying this tax on cigarettes – $60,724,894.40 – Cuyahoga has been paying this tax since February 2007. It’s a tax that I believe will be extended on and on.
That adds up to some $220 million in taxes (not counting the $266 million for Gateway) on Cuyahoga taxpayers with tens of millions more to be collected before these taxes run out.
These taxes will continue for many years.
Cleveland and Cuyahoga County are both losing population. That means there are fewer people paying these taxes.
We see the effect it has had on RTA. The transit system depends also on the shrinking sales tax, one percent of the 7.75 sales tax, highest of any county in Ohio. Fewer people mean less purchasing thus less sales tax revenue. Population losses and higher percentages of poor people suggest further erosion of sales tax revenue.
The burden of these seemingly small taxes is heavy. They go from taxes on almost all alcoholic drinks, cigarettes, to parking and other revenue, such as the city’s parking revenue.
The latest tax increase county taxpayers are enduring is the added sales tax of one-quarter percent that raises some $40 million a year for a convention center and medical mart. These facilities serve far more than the people of Cleveland or Cuyahoga County. Why should the burden be limited to only Cuyahoga taxpayers?
In addition, almost all of these publicly subsidized institutions pay no property taxes, leaving the costs of fire, police, school, roads and many other services funded by property taxes. Home and commercial property owners pay more in higher property taxes. And tax abatements – which essentially go to higher income housing – to new and renewed housing also eats into revenue sources
But why does Cleveland have to pay the entire public cost of the Cleveland Browns playing field? Why do Cuyahoga County taxpayers have to pay essentially the entire cost of the playgrounds of the Cleveland Cavaliers and Cleveland Indians?
Most of the residents can’t even afford to attend these high-priced events.
The local taxpayers can no longer afford the many publicly-dependent institutions that provide entertainment for a much wider – and much wealthier – audience than the people of Cleveland and Cuyahoga County.
This is a problem of the entire northeast Ohio area, its residents and its taxing structure. The financial burden then should be shared more widely.
We hear a lot of talk about regionalism. This could be a most rewarding form of regionalism.
Why do Cuyahoga County residents alone have to pay for the culture tax that provides funds for some of our major (orchestra, museum) cultural institutions and many smaller arts and culture institutions?
The time is coming – really it has passed – when all the institutions this once wealthy city enjoyed and afforded can be supported by a shrinking and far less wealthy population.
We’re running out of the resources to finance what we have. Too institutionally rich; too economically deprived.
Now is the time to let the people of Lake, Summit, Medina, Lorain, Geauga know that they need to share in the burden of the cost of Cleveland and the treasurer of Cleveland and Cuyahoga County that they enjoy. Of course, some of the same type institutions in outlying areas should share in the wider financing method, whatever that becomes.
It’s time to think about a more regional tax approach to service the wealth of institutions in our communities. It ought to start with capturing taxes on a progressive basis from the beginning.
It’s a matter of fairness. The tax burden must be widened to a larger pool. It should also go where the money is.