Posts Tagged George Voinovich
Broke My Rule and Crain’s Shows Why I Shouldn’t
Posted by Roldo Bartimole in Media, People, Politicians on May 27, 2010
I broke my standing rule about saying something nice about anything or anybody. Always disappointed soon after. I praised the Crain’s Cleveland Business daily blog recently. I don’t take that back. And I still congratulate the weekly business magazine on its 30th birthday. BUT…
Crain’s did a series on some Cleveland’s most influential (their selection) people in the last 30 years.
It’s fluff and puff at its worst.
Mostly done, of course, for blatant advertising revenue. The ads accompany the profiles and photos of Important People – a rogue’s gallery in my opinion. They are mostly Important People who helped produce the Cleveland of today.
Is there anyone who likes what they see?
Everyone profiled is a hero. From Art Falco at Playhouse Square to Peter Lewis of Progressive. And of course, the late Richard Shatten and the late Dick Jacobs. Fred Nance of Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, of course. And even LeBron James.
And the saintly George Voinovich. Who could forget that? Get ready for the platitudes by the bushel as Voinovich’s Senate term comes to an end. If there is anything that has happened that isn’t GREAT we’ll never know. Because someone will have to explain (but won’t) why the City of Cleveland, Cuyahoga County and the State of Ohio are in such bad shape after Voinovich served as Mayor, County Commissioner and Governor. It’s too difficult a task. And too embarrassing.
Voinovich, his profile says, should have copyrighted the term “public-private partnership.”
Yes, he should have. The problem is that the see-saw public/private sharing usually meant that the public paid and the private enjoyed. As in Gateway, the Browns stadium, downtown development, rock hall, Playhouse Square. None of these Voinovich fans ever even tries to tote the public cost, especially to the Cleveland schools.
The article says, “As he would throughout his career, Mr. Voinovich downplayed his own role.”
Of course, he did.
He had The Plain Dealer, Crain’s and every Cleveland television station doing it for him.
Somehow, Crain’s forgot George Forbes. I guess George’s law firm wouldn’t spring for the ad to accompany the flattery.
Nor did they profile former Mayor Michael White. No alpaca ads.
So they failed to highlight two of the most crucial figures – at least in politics – of the past three decades.
And it goes without saying that Dennis Kucinich didn’t make the cut.
Of course, it’s only Cleveland’s history by Crain’s Cleveland Business. So you know it’s limited.
But as the headline on the front of Crain’s 30 years special edition says, – “Make Your Own History.” Certainly, Crain’s did that.
Do Taxpayers of Cleveland & Cuyahoga Have to Always Carry the Cost of Institutions that Serve a Much Wider Area of Northeast Ohio?
Posted by Roldo Bartimole in Economic Development, Politicians on May 6, 2010
May 6, 2010… I read in the New York Times Friday that plans are being formulated to redo Progressive Field. Who knew?
A Gateway official says, however, that there is no big redo coming. Further, at this point, both teams leasing sports facilities are responsible for capital improvements.
But don’t you know that it is coming: We need a new stadium! The Indians might leave town! What we’ve heard before we will hear again. It’s only a matter of time.
It does bring up the question of how Cleveland and Cuyahoga County can continue to afford to build and support major institutions that serve a larger geographic area. Not only sports but cultural.
It does seem past the time for thinking about how we preserve the many facilities, institutions and infrastructure assets of Cleveland. The city is rich in major sports and cultural institutions, relics of a wealthier era. How can they be preserved? Who will pay for them?
Most of the actual institutions servicing Northeastern Ohio residents physically are in Cleveland or Cuyahoga County. Does that mean only those residents enjoy those venues? Of course not.
Progressive Field, Quicken Arena, Browns Stadium, Playhouse Square’s stages (Allen, Ohio, State, Palace theaters), the Cleveland Art Museum, Severance Hall and the Cleveland Orchestra. Even the highly subsidized downtown assets of Cleveland. These are places that serve a wider area of northeast Ohio, not just Cleveland or Cuyahoga residents.
But the bill to pay for these important institutions seems to fall, at least the public portion, most heavily upon Cleveland and Cuyahoga taxpayers. Every day in almost every way. And, unfortunately, they are regressive sales taxes weighing heavily on lower and middle income people. None are progressive taxes. Thanks to people like Tim Hagan and Mike White, George Voinovich and George Forbes.
In the latest County Auditor reports we get an idea of the tax burden here:
- The Medical Mart/Convention Center – Cuyahoga taxpayers have contributed via the quarter percent sale tax hike – $94,379,438.38 since only January 2008. Cuyahoga residents will be paying this tax for 20 years.
- Browns Stadium – Cuyahoga taxpayers have contributed via various alcohol sales taxes – $64,609,806.86 since August 2005. The tax previously amounted to some $266 million to help pay for some of Gateway’s costs at the baseball and basketball facilities. The tax was levied for 15 years for Gateway and 10 more years for the football stadium, taking us to 2015. Hopefully, not to be renewed.
- The Arts & Culture tax – Cuyahoga taxpayers have been paying this tax on cigarettes – $60,724,894.40 – Cuyahoga has been paying this tax since February 2007. It’s a tax that I believe will be extended on and on.
That adds up to some $220 million in taxes (not counting the $266 million for Gateway) on Cuyahoga taxpayers with tens of millions more to be collected before these taxes run out.
These taxes will continue for many years.
Cleveland and Cuyahoga County are both losing population. That means there are fewer people paying these taxes.
We see the effect it has had on RTA. The transit system depends also on the shrinking sales tax, one percent of the 7.75 sales tax, highest of any county in Ohio. Fewer people mean less purchasing thus less sales tax revenue. Population losses and higher percentages of poor people suggest further erosion of sales tax revenue.
The burden of these seemingly small taxes is heavy. They go from taxes on almost all alcoholic drinks, cigarettes, to parking and other revenue, such as the city’s parking revenue.
The latest tax increase county taxpayers are enduring is the added sales tax of one-quarter percent that raises some $40 million a year for a convention center and medical mart. These facilities serve far more than the people of Cleveland or Cuyahoga County. Why should the burden be limited to only Cuyahoga taxpayers?
In addition, almost all of these publicly subsidized institutions pay no property taxes, leaving the costs of fire, police, school, roads and many other services funded by property taxes. Home and commercial property owners pay more in higher property taxes. And tax abatements – which essentially go to higher income housing – to new and renewed housing also eats into revenue sources
But why does Cleveland have to pay the entire public cost of the Cleveland Browns playing field? Why do Cuyahoga County taxpayers have to pay essentially the entire cost of the playgrounds of the Cleveland Cavaliers and Cleveland Indians?
Most of the residents can’t even afford to attend these high-priced events.
The local taxpayers can no longer afford the many publicly-dependent institutions that provide entertainment for a much wider – and much wealthier – audience than the people of Cleveland and Cuyahoga County.
This is a problem of the entire northeast Ohio area, its residents and its taxing structure. The financial burden then should be shared more widely.
We hear a lot of talk about regionalism. This could be a most rewarding form of regionalism.
Why do Cuyahoga County residents alone have to pay for the culture tax that provides funds for some of our major (orchestra, museum) cultural institutions and many smaller arts and culture institutions?
The time is coming – really it has passed – when all the institutions this once wealthy city enjoyed and afforded can be supported by a shrinking and far less wealthy population.
We’re running out of the resources to finance what we have. Too institutionally rich; too economically deprived.
Now is the time to let the people of Lake, Summit, Medina, Lorain, Geauga know that they need to share in the burden of the cost of Cleveland and the treasurer of Cleveland and Cuyahoga County that they enjoy. Of course, some of the same type institutions in outlying areas should share in the wider financing method, whatever that becomes.
It’s time to think about a more regional tax approach to service the wealth of institutions in our communities. It ought to start with capturing taxes on a progressive basis from the beginning.
It’s a matter of fairness. The tax burden must be widened to a larger pool. It should also go where the money is.