Posts Tagged Jeff Jacobs
Jacobs-Ratner Fight Continues with Issue 3 Vote
Posted by Roldo Bartimole in Economic Development, People, Politicians on October 27th, 2009
October 27, 2009… Damian Guevara in the Cleveland Scene last week had a take on the Issue 3 that has been neglected by most, including me, but touches on a damaging game among Cleveland developers. They vie among themselves for advantage no matter what the cost to community.
It has cost us plenty over the years.
Guevara points out that Forest City Enterprises would be a winner if the measure passes. And that its rival, Jeff Jacobs, wants to stop it, making him the winner.
The battle between the two families – Jacobs & Ratner – has been going on in Cleveland for years. Neither cares much about the damage they cause the city.
“The question for Greater Clevelanders,” writes, Guevara, a former Plain Dealer reporter, “Do you trust wealthy pro-casino interests – in this case, Cleveland Cavaliers owner Dan Gilbert – to deliver on the latest promise of blue-collar and hospitality jobs, multi-million-dollar tax payments and yet another facelift of downtown Cleveland?”
I’d say no.
He calls the manipulation of the constitution inherent in a “yes” vote for Issue 3, a “deal-breaker” for many.
But the beneficiaries are clear, he notices.
“For all the vagueness of the constitutional amendment,” he writes, “there is some astounding specificity to be found in the amendment’s wording, the list of designated parcels put aside for casino construction. In Cleveland, this includes 83 acres of real estate. The Cleveland casino will, parcel-for-parcel, go on land owned by Forest City Enterprises, or the adjacent Scranton Peninsula in the industrial flats, just across the Cuyahoga river, all owned by Forest City.”
Of course, the major opponent to Gilbert’s casino desire is Jeff Jacobs, son of the late Dick Jacobs and a developer and casino operator himself.
The Jacobs-Ratner (Forest City Enterprises) battle has a long history of rivalry in Cleveland. Damaging to the city, too.
When Dick Jacobs built what is now Key Center he made it taller than Forest City’s Terminal Tower. There had been an unwritten law in Cleveland no building should be taller than Terminal Tower. That’s why the Sohio building remained shorter. They are all Public Square buildings.
Some called it developer penis envy.
When Jacobs got a special deal on the Marriott hotel, Sam Miller of Forest City demanded equal tax breaks for his Ritz-Carlton. He got it.
The biggest battle was fought over Chagrin Highlands, a plot of land more than 500 acres that the city allowed for development in 1989. Unbeknownst to anyone, Dick Jacobs was made a principal thanks to George Forbes. When Jacobs wanted to build a retail center at the same time as Beachwood Place was expanding, Mayor Michael White caused the city to sue Jacobs.
The suit stopped Jacobs’s plan; Beachwood Place, with Ratner interests, went ahead with its expansion. The suit was later dropped.
It was Jacobs vs. Ratner on the new County administration building. Jacobs sold his East 9th property to the County for that purpose while Forest City still owns its offering to the County, the mostly empty Higbee department store building.
The two factions also fought over placement of the Medical Mart/Convention Center with Jacobs winning with the location of the present city’s center.
Originally, when the plan was passed by City Council years ago for a convention center, Scranton Peninsula was its location, with Forest City promising other retail and housing development there.
So around and around these two major Cleveland forces go.
Another question to be answered is whether any principals in the deal, if passed, will be from the Ratner or Miller families. Gilbert isn’t talking about that.
Hate to make a choice on this one but I’m pulling for Jacobs this time.
Guevara’s piece can be found here: http://www.clevescene.com/cleveland/cash-of-the-titans/Content?oid=1690218
Mayor Frank Jackson and “What Is Is” Campaign
Posted by Roldo Bartimole in Economic Development, Politicians on October 15th, 2009
October 15, 2009… Could this be the dullest, most meaningless mayoral election of all time? Well, it is what it is, ain’t it?
If I were running against Jackson I’d say strongly and often, “What it IS should not BE.”
General election opponent Bill Patmon, who has no money and not enough name recognition city-wide, did attack Jackson for this anemic attitude of acceptance.
You’d think we have a monk, not a mayor.
“The message that the current administration does not care is clear. But the attitude, ‘it is what it is,’ is neither acceptable nor wise in a time when this city, and every other city for that matter, critically counts on its tax base for survival” Patmon told the Plain Dealer. He hit the right tone.
The problem also is that the news media have been turned off on the election. For Patmon that’s a disaster since he has no money to push any agenda into focus.
Patmon, of course, is correct. Mayor Jackson’s oath of acceptance is not good enough, not nearly good enough.
A city with no spirit isn’t going to be helped by some Buddhist-like mind-set. It’s not a brew that offers much hope.
Mayor Jackson seems to be in a go-along mode.
Two million bucks for an aquarium – which likely will be more like a fish tank – for Jeff Jacobs, okay. It is what it is. Hundreds of millions of dollars for a medical mart and convention center, alright. It is what it is.
Tens of millions of dollars for a diluted Wolstein project, why not? It is what it is.
A new port at the cost of hundreds of millions of dollars and one that negates other plans and studies? So? It is what it is.
Monopoly casino? Why not? It is what it is.
That’s not leadership. That is what it is, of course. But it is not what it should be.
Cleveland better start looking for new leaders NOW for the future. It’s already much too late for the city. It needs a leader who will do more than see acceptance as a policy.