Posts Tagged television
Boycott WKYC for Slashing Pay of Its Workers
Posted by Roldo Bartimole in Media on February 8, 2010
February 8, 2010… Cleveland’s TV station owners are – as are other corporations – taking advantage of the job problems – by slashing the pay of its workers. It’s for no other reason than they can apparently get away with it.
The Cleveland Scene has been watching this issue.
This item on its blog reveals that WKYC-TV, Channel 3, is slashing pay without dealing with its union. Just cut it and let them run to the NLRB, I guess is the attitude.
What people need to do is tell WKYC that they will boycott the station’s news as long as its workers are being so shabbily treated.
Here’s the Scene piece:
TROUBLE IN TV LAND
After nine months of difficult negotiations, management at Cleveland’s WKYC-TV3 has broken off labor negotiations and implemented a unilateral pay cut for union members.
The National Association of Broadcast Employees and Technicians, Communications Workers of America (NABET-CWA) says the station is in violation of its contract, which should have been in place for another 18 months. It’s filed a grievance with the National Labor Relations Board and is now seeking a federal injunction to enforce the contract.
For the pay period that began January 10, management implemented pay cuts for union members that amount to reduction of between 8 and 18 percent. Last week, 54 employees received their first reduced paycheck. Most of them have technical jobs, from broadcast maintenance to videography. The union says the station also implemented other unauthorized changes affecting work hours, sick days and vacation days.
The union’s national representative, Lou Fallot, has been traveling from Washington, D.C., to Cleveland for bargaining. A federal mediator became involved in September, but the station’s stance remained firm.
“From day one, they made statements saying they were going to get economic concessions by this or any other means,” says Fallot.
Early last year, non-union employees took a pay cut between 4 and 6 percent and accepted a one-week furlough. “We were willing to take the same pay cuts that the non-union people were talking,” says NABET-CWA Local 42 vice president James Kolendo. “They turned that down.”
Fallot says the union’s last offer was a five percent wage reduction. “The station said it wasn’t even worth a counter [offer],” reports Fallot. “They’re hellbent on achieving their proposals without doing any further bargaining.”
Fallot, who represents the union at a dozen stations, says the situation is “very unusual. I find Gannett [Broadcasting, WKYC’s parent corporation] to be the most greedy, arrogant company I’ve ever had the pleasure of negotiating.”
WKYC General Manager Brooke Spectorsky had no comment on the situation and characterized the cuts as “new posted conditions after reaching an impasse.” He said the station’s cuts would remain in effect “until such time as we sit back down and negotiate a new contact.”
A membership meeting is scheduled for February 13. Fallot would not discuss whether the union was considering a strike. — D.X. Ferris
Tom Beres WKYC Show Marred by Conflicts of Interest
Posted by Roldo Bartimole in Economic Development, Media on September 6, 2009
September 6, 2009… WKYC’s Tom Beres remains one of the few serious reporters on local television. That said, it’s shameful that his “Between the Lines” Sunday show too often has conflict of interest written all over it.
Not his personal conflict of interest. Those of his “guests.” That, however, makes it his problem.
WKYC should either do this show right or not do it at all. Management apparently wants to take credit for Beres’ good reputation but doesn’t want to do the show as it should be done.
Beres, entitled Senior Political Reporter for WKYC, has a few minutes each Sunday to rush through comments about important issues – another problem with the show. More seriously his guests are typically people who represent political and business interest as consultants.
They shouldn’t be given air time.
This week was a perfect example when Beres had to disclose that both his guests represent gambling interests as he opened a discussion of gambling issues. Beres may believe that the quick and insufficient discloser he made covers his ass but really it points out a serious problem for his show.
One of the subjects they discussed: Gambling.
Both his guests – Mary Anne Sharkey and Dennis Eckart – represent gambling interests involved in current issues. Two gambling issues are heavy in the news – slots, as prescribed by Gov. Ted Strickland, and casino gambling up for a state-wide vote in November.
Here’s a link to his page for this week’s show:
http://www.wkyc.com/news/politics_govt/politics_article.aspx?storyid=120979&catid=130
These gambling issues involve millions of dollars in lobbying and tens or hundreds of millions of dollars that could be spent if realized. Serious problems evolve from gambling and any discussion about the issue should involve people with absolutely no interest in the financial outcome.
The other problem with this show and other Between the Lines is the little time given. That results in Beres rushing through important issues of the day hastily because of the time factor.
I believe he’s saddled with guests he might not choose if he had the authority. I hate to think they are his real personal choices.
However, the decision is his responsibility, but it also falls upon the Channel 3 station management to offer the public honest commentary in a show that suggests it is providing honest public analysis.
It’s anything but unbiased when you have lobbyist/consultants assessing the very issues that they depend upon for their livelihood.
It happens too often on this show.