Posts Tagged WJW

DeMarino Slams Old Bosses on Fox 8 I-Team Deceptions

March 15, 2010… You might wonder why Mark DeMarino gives a damn about Fox News’ WJW-TV, Channel 8, his former employer. But he does. He can’t shake the idea that journalism is supposed to be about something meaningful.

In this day of cost cutbacks – some possibly necessary, many seemingly simply to cut costs – newspaper and broadcast outlets would be the target of a typical I-Team investigation. About not delivering what is promised. Bait and switch.

That’s what prompted DeMarino to fire off a blistering email to news director Sonya Thompson and other station managers.

It’s a message that shouts, “I’m through with journalism because that’s not what it is anymore.”

DeMarino – an award winning reporter/researcher who left Ch. 8 about this time last year – charged the station management with deception by tagging ordinary stories with the I-Team brand. It’s a brand he helped make valuable.

DeMarino said in an email to me that he was upset because the station “was pulling a fast one with its viewers. It has never told viewers that it’s eliminated its investigative unit, yet, station management wants to benefit from the I-Team brand by calling these general assignment type stories “I-Team” stories when, in fact, they are not.”

He cited in conversation one recent example of misuse of an I-Team report. The report last week had Lorrie Taylor trying to make an investigative piece about Yazeed Essa’s empty jail cell. (He was convicted last week of murdering his wife Rosemarie.) The item is entitled “I-Team exclusive – Inside Essa’s Jail Cell.” It’s hard to make a relevant investigation of showing a cushioned jail cell bed though Taylor made the best of the assignment.

DeMarino told Thompson, “Any news operation must be an honest broker of information, sad to say your continued labeling of general assignment stories, by either Bill Sheil or Lorrie Taylor, as I-Team is deceptive, misleading and a disservice to your viewers and sponsors.”

He notes in an email to me that money wouldn’t be a problem if management would “take a critical look at some of the huge salaries paid their anchors and the number of newsroom managers.” If television stations did examine these high salaries, “there is money to fund a legitimate I-Team unit,” wrote DeMarino.

DeMarino was a newsman for some 33 years in radio and television, most of it in Cleveland. In disgust, he took a buyout at Ch. 8 last year after working at the station for 16 years. He has served as investigative reporter for Carl Monday and Tom Merriman in addition to Sheil and Taylor.

“The city’s news business lost another dedicated newsman whose long and distinguished service – back to the 1970s – went more or less generally unobserved,” I wrote a year ago when he departed Ch. 8.

DeMarino was researcher and behind-the-scenes reporter for the I-Team, putting together the investigative guts of reports that were hosted by a team of on-air persons.

DeMarino’s passion for his job still comes through in his message to the station management.

“It’s bait and switch,” he writes of the use of the I-Team brand on regular stories. The regular news pieces are given the I-Team branding to suggest that the reports are the result of investigative reporting.

The former I-Team researcher finds this reprehensible.

“It’s a knockoff Coach purse,” DeMarino writes, borrowing the term from an investigation the team did on scam artists selling knockoffs of the brand named pocketbooks.

“The stories are threadbare, faded, and thrown together in a rush. Either invest in people and resources to resurrect the I-Team, or leave it alone,” he wrote to Thompson.

“What you are doing is cheap, lazy and cowardly,” wrote DeMarino, leaving nothing of his feelings to the imagination.

Thompson did not respond to an email request for her comment. Oddly, Ch. 8’s website doesn’t have a telephone number and in the yellow pages under television stations, Fox 8 isn’t listed, though other TV stations are.

One has to note with a bit of irony, however, that if you call the I-Team’s telephone number (432-4228) who answers? Mark DeMarino’s voice still responds, “This is the Fox 8 I-Team. Leave your name and your number… we’ll try to get right back to you.”

DeMarino shared in numerous awards, including the coveted Alfred I. DuPont/Columbia Journalism Award for broadcast excellence in 2006. It is comparable to the Pulitzer Awards in print journalism.

The DuPont award resulted from an investigation and expose of the Cleveland school system. DeMarino, in an undercover role, filmed school bus drivers sitting idly, using school buses to pick up girl friends and on personal shopping tours. It was estimated the probe resulted in some $4 million in savings for the schools.

The school bus expose also won a prestigious Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE) national award “for exposing millions of dollars in waste, gross mismanagement and cover-up in the Cleveland Municipal School District.” It was a multi-part investigation that had undercover film of some 200 bus drivers at the bus station that did little more than play pool while on the payroll. At the same time, teachers were laid off by the school system.

A competitor, Tom Beres of WKYC-TV, Channel 3, said of DeMarino upon his leaving Ch. 8, “His connections, insight and institutional memory and historical background will be missed.” Beres said DeMarino was “grossly underappreciated,” a statement I couldn’t agree with more.

Too bad. But what can you expect these days from local news.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Does Jimmy Dimora Deserve His Rights?

June 30, 2009… Does Jimmy Dimora deserve the privilege of being considered innocent until proven guilty? I don’t think The Plain Dealer believes so.

I can’t argue with there being news coverage of the county corruption issues. However, I think the Plain Dealer has been using the mess for a circulation boost.

Big black headlines almost daily. Lots of space that give the impression of a crusade. Large photographs of public officials.

It all has the quality of a campaign. However, editors don’t run for office.

They are running these days, however, for their lives. The temptation to play a juicy story big to attract and keep readers and subscribers has to be enticing.

Newspapers are troubled by declining interest and declining revenues. Anything that can change that formula presents opportunities.

Fat Jimmy Dimora makes quite a target. And the PD has been using him as a piñata on the front page almost daily.

Yesterday Dimora struck back. What he had to say doesn’t absolve him of anything yet. However, it did strike a feeling in me of, hey, maybe this guy isn’t as guilty as he’s been painted.

As he said himself, “I’m not an angel, but I’m not a crook.”

Well, it may take a court to prove the latter.

Until that time, the guy is innocent under our laws.

Someone said that Dimora was being Sam “Shepparded” by the PD. That refers to the way Sam Sheppard’s guilt in the murder of his wife was railroaded by the Cleveland news media, especially the defunct Cleveland Press. The truth in the Sheppard case, whatever it was, got mangled.

I don’t think what the PD has done is the same. However, the headlines have the same smell.

It’s not a good direction for a newspaper. It’s not good for a newspaper in the long run. It can damage credibility.

I watched the video the PD put on its site of the press conference. It ran 2:59 minutes. The press conference, according to someone who timed it, ran about 33 minutes. I went to Channel 8, WJW, to view its video. It was 12:11 seconds. It gave a better feel for what Dimora had to say.

I got a more comprehensive view of Dimora’s press conference from the television station than I did from the newspaper.

I asked the PD about its abbreviated video.

Managing editor Debra Simmons responded to the email I sent Editor Susan Goldberg, who is out of town, saying “We quickly posted a short excerpt of the press conference last night. There’s more to come. We will put the full press conference on line this afternoon.”

As of 1:25, Tuesday, as this is being written, the 2:59 minute version is still up. There are more than 100 responses, most seem clearly against Dimora and with the typical mocking tone: “Boss Feed,” “Needs a psychiatrist,” “It’s a blimp.”

(In checking back at 1:45 the original video was gone and there was no replacement in its place of a longer version at that time.)

(Checking in the evening, Cleveland.com has what I believe is the entire Dimora press conference in two segements.)

Since Dimora has been dominating the front page of the PD with stories pointing to his dishonesty, I thought it would have been fair for the PD to give him his full shot. The paper did play the press conference on the front page. And it did have – likely for the first time – a respectful photo of the man. It’s easy to ridicule with huge photos, especially of an admittedly overweight man.

You can convict people more easily on the front page than you can in a courtroom.

I did get a response from Goldberg on another question I asked. I asked her in an email about Dimora’s criticism of her and Brent Larkin’s lunch with Republican boss Bob Bennett and whether she had had similar sit-downs with Democratic leaders.

Here’s her response: “The criticism of me having lunch with a Republican official is beyond ridiculous. I have had lunches, breakfasts and coffees (and multiple foodless meetings) with dozens and dozens of people from across the political spectrum. I consider it part of my job. Without looking at my calendar or getting into specifics, I would guess I’ve had more meetings with Democrats than Republicans, if only because there are more elected Democratic officials than Republicans around here.”

Dimora wants us to believe that there was a conspiracy hatched out of the President George Bush administration via Karl Rove to get Democratic Party leaders before the 2008 election.

That’s something I don’t have too much trouble considering.

, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments